Jones urges passing of CSLR bill this month
Stephen Jones has called on the Government to act quickly on the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) and Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) as it returns to Parliament this week.
Jones, Minister for Financial Services and Assistant Treasurer, said the two measures would strengthen Australia’s financial system.
There were around 2,000 cases on hold with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), he said, which were awaiting passage of the CSLR while others were still waiting for redress to be paid.
The CSLR bill was introduced earlier this month to the House of Representatives under the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Services Compensation Scheme of Last Resort) Bill 2023. It had previously been part of the Credit Act but was removed at the end of 2022.
“These Bills will make executives more accountable for the conduct of financial institutions, and provide an avenue of redress for victims of financial misconduct. These are important protections for consumers and they have waited long enough.
“If the CSLR Bills are not passed this month, consumers will be waiting until 2024 to receive compensation.
“Similarly, the longer the wait for the FAR goes on, the more uncertainty there will be amongst the financial industry about the obligations that will be imposed upon them.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
As Viola Private Wealth continues on its growth trajectory, the wealth management firm has appointed a seasoned investment professional to be its first chief investment officer.
Financial advisers who wish to implement artificial intelligence in their practices need to undergo a change in their mindset as to how they use technology.
Investment Trends has named HUB24 as the top investment platform in terms of overall functionality for the third year in a row.
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
So just another nail in the coffin of Advisers, how about the Fund Managers cough up the 250 million dollars for the failed funds, It their colleagues who managed those failed funds. Consumers are in the plum seat Complain get a payment irrelevant of the reason. and the Fund Managers Slip Cheques to the Major parties and pesto move the problem to the most liability and lest able to afford it. Yep that right the adviser.
This is bad legislation. More cost for us, no risk for crooks and zero oversight from ASIC. Purely reactive and we wind up paying for it (again). Jones, you have no idea what you are doing and should vacate the portfolio for someone who does. BTW, Duke is still confused by how this is holding up compensation to clients. Isn't that what indemnity insurance is all about? No in the even the insurance did not exist, where was ASIC to pull the licenses? Again...why always us?