Jones urges passing of CSLR bill this month

Stephen Jones CSLR financial accountability regime

20 March 2023
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

Stephen Jones has called on the Government to act quickly on the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) and Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) as it returns to Parliament this week. 

Jones, Minister for Financial Services and Assistant Treasurer, said the two measures would strengthen Australia’s financial system. 

There were around 2,000 cases on hold with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), he said, which were awaiting passage of the CSLR while others were still waiting for redress to be paid. 

The CSLR bill was introduced earlier this month to the House of Representatives under the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Services Compensation Scheme of Last Resort) Bill 2023. It had previously been part of the Credit Act but was removed at the end of 2022. 

“These Bills will make executives more accountable for the conduct of financial institutions, and provide an avenue of redress for victims of financial misconduct. These are important protections for consumers and they have waited long enough.

“If the CSLR Bills are not passed this month, consumers will be waiting until 2024 to receive compensation.

“Similarly, the longer the wait for the FAR goes on, the more uncertainty there will be amongst the financial industry about the obligations that will be imposed upon them.”

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Tired Adviser on Tue, 2023-03-21 08:58

So just another nail in the coffin of Advisers, how about the Fund Managers cough up the 250 million dollars for the failed funds, It their colleagues who managed those failed funds. Consumers are in the plum seat Complain get a payment irrelevant of the reason. and the Fund Managers Slip Cheques to the Major parties and pesto move the problem to the most liability and lest able to afford it. Yep that right the adviser.

Submitted by Duke Nukem on Tue, 2023-03-21 08:58

This is bad legislation. More cost for us, no risk for crooks and zero oversight from ASIC. Purely reactive and we wind up paying for it (again). Jones, you have no idea what you are doing and should vacate the portfolio for someone who does. BTW, Duke is still confused by how this is holding up compensation to clients. Isn't that what indemnity insurance is all about? No in the even the insurance did not exist, where was ASIC to pull the licenses? Again...why always us?

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS