Is it too expensive to maintain planners on register?
ANZ Banking Group, which accounted for this week’s biggest loss of 20 adviser roles, has explained the roles which were formally taken off the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC’s) Financial Advisers Register (FAR) were mostly supportive roles, such as paraplanning, and the staff will remain at ANZ.
According to HFS Consulting’s director Colin Williams, such movements might herald a new trend as maintaining the required training and skills to be classed as financial advisers would mean higher costs for organisations and become risk prohibitive.
“I am confident we will see a lot more of this as the year progresses as it is getting too expensive and risky to keep staff registered as financial advisers. I expect to see more support staff and other roles such as accountants who occasionally provide advice to be removed from the register,” he said.
This week GWM Adviser Services continued to lose adviser roles as it accounted for the second biggest drops in adviser number, with six more roles gone, on top of 12 roles which were removed from the register last week, according to HFS Consulting’s analysis.
Also, one of the groups owned by Easton Investments, The SMSF Expert, posted this week a loss of three adviser roles while four other licensees (Affinia Financial Advisers, Axies Pty, Charter Financial Planning and Commonwealth Financial Planning) all lost two advisers.
Source: IFS Consulting
According to Williams, in general adviser losses definitely slowed over recent months and between the start of January, 2020 until today there was a net loss of -2,950 advisers of which more than 2,200 happened in the first half of 2020.
In total, this week saw 41 Advisers appointed to 35 licensees, 39 being advisers who switched from another licensee and two being ‘new’ provisional advisers.
At the same time, 67 Advisers resigned from 33 licensees, leaving the net (-26) reduction in adviser numbers.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
