ISA lobbies for changes to FSR terms of reference
Industry Super Australia (ISA) has lobbied to have the terms of reference for the Government's Financial Systems Review (FSR) amended to deal with conflicts of interests and incentives in the provision of financial advice.
In its submission to Treasury on the terms of reference for the FSR exercise, the ISA has urged that the language of the draft terms of reference be revised "to focus on how consumer preferences can be developed free of conflicts of interest, and the incentives of financial firms and sales personnel can be aligned with the with the best interest of the consumer".
The submission has also recommended that the terms of reference should traverse the fees and costs of financial services on an individual consumer basis and on an aggregate economic basis, while considering "ways in which fees and costs in all respects can be reduced".
It claims that a few items of the draft terms of reference "imply a view of financial services that is very demand driven, particularly that the services provided and the terms and conditions thereof are primarily a response to the interests and demands of consumers and users of financial services more generally".
"We believe a more complete view should reflect how the demands of consumers are created and influenced by the financial services sector itself," the submission said.
"It has long been observed that financial products are ‘sold, not bought.' The purchases of consumers are intricately shaped by sales and advice personnel. For the Inquiry to truly encourage products that are in the interest of consumers, the incentives in the distribution and sales of finance would be a more fruitful area of emphasis than the responsiveness of the industry to apparent demand (after it has been shaped)."
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
