Investors report lack of adviser interest in ESG
Financial advisers have a role to educate consumers on how their views on environmental, social and governance investing can be translated in their portfolios.
Research by New Zealand fintech, Capital Preferences, of over 300 advised investors found 59% said they placed high importance on ESG factors in their investments, with the highest proportion among those with $350k-$1.4 million in assets.
However, less than 40% felt their adviser was committed to helping them invest sustainably and only 20% said their adviser explained ESG concepts and terms to them.
While there was a desire to invest with ESG goals in mind, there was a lack of understanding around how it could be translated in their portfolios.
The majority said they were unaware of concepts such as negative screening or impact investing and only one in seven said they were confident that their portfolio was fully aligned to their values.
Only 34% of those who rated ESG as ‘somewhat important, important or very important’ could identify how much they wanted invested in ESG and 27% knew how they wanted ESG represented in their portfolios.
“Tight alignment between an investor’s ESG preferences and portfolio is central to a high-calibre experience,” the firm said.
“It underscores the need for wealth managers and superannuation funds to educate and help investors and members discover their own ESG portfolios.”
This could be done by using educational tools, client discovery tools, sustainability metrics, reports on the sustainability of their investments and alerting clients if a company they had shares in had an ESG-related controversy.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
