Investors in hybrid funds forced to wait and see

van-eyk/gearing/property/van-eyk-research/asset-classes/investors/director/

5 September 2008
| By Mike Taylor |

With the value of investment portfolios falling, some investors are looking to redeem value from asset classes they believe haven’t yet been hurt by re-pricing. The result has been the run on hybrid property funds and the freeze on redemptions from these funds over the past fortnight, according to van Eyk Research managing director Stephen van Eyk.

While listed property funds have now largely been re-priced, investors are yet to see the true value of many direct property investments, and there are concerns about a significant downwards repricing in the sector following listed property’s spectacular fall from grace.

But Property Investment Research associate director Dugald Higgins thinks many investors in hybrid funds are simply “hitting the panic button”.

“I think people tend to forget that property should be viewed as a long-term investment,” Higgins said.

He believes financial planners and investors should consider the need to exit a fund, rather than a desire to. Higgins argued that investors still receiving reasonable income from hybrid funds should be able to ride out the current volatility.

In regards to the re-pricing of direct property, van Eyk said it’s important to remember that gearing is a point of differentiation between listed and unlisted property funds, with the former more heavily geared than the latter.

“Listed funds were heavily geared, and that played a part in their downfall,” van Eyk said.

“You wouldn’t expect valuations [for unlisted properties] to fall nearly as far, although capitalisation rates may adjust upwards, which could reduce value,” he said.

According to Standard & Poor’s director of fund ratings Peter Ward, there are arguments for the strength of the underlying fundamentals of the Australian property market. Ward said while some investors may be fearful of a repeat of the property disasters of the early 90s, today is a “significantly different environment” in terms of more favourable vacancy rates, economic and interest rate conditions, and supply/demand ratios.

But the sector is not immune to the stresses facing most asset classes in the current environment.

Higgins said broader economic concerns, the potential for rising unemployment levels in particular, could “put a lid on profit growth and put further pressure on underlying values” in direct property investments.

While the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show the unemployment rate remaining steady, these figures do lag, and Higgins said significant job losses in firms like Babcock & Brown and Starbucks could be a an indication of more job losses to come.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

3 days 7 hours ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND