Investors failing to ‘walk the talk’ on ESG products
Usage of environmental, social and governance (ESG) products remains low at just 10% of retail investors but 65% say they have interest in doing so in the future.
In a survey by the CFA Institute, only 10% of retail investors were invested in ESG products and 19% of institutional investors.
However, the number of investors who were interested in these types of strategies was far higher at 76% of institutions and 65% of retail ones.
The number of CFA Institute members who said they took ESG into account had risen from 73% in 2017 to 85% and 90% of respondents said they expected their firms’ commitment to ESG research would increase, up from 72% two years ago.
The study, which questioned 7,000 people, found people considered ESG for reasons including client demand, potential for improved financial returns and the need to manage investment risks.
Over three-quarters of respondents said there was a need for improved standards around ESG in order to mitigate greenwashing and boost transparency.
“Incorporating sustainability in investment management has become part of our industry’s mission to serve society by improving long-term outcomes,” said Margaret Franklin, president and chief executive of CFA Institute.
“This moment represents a valuable opportunity for organisations to address this challenge and help shape a future worth investing in. As the focus on sustainability in investing gathers momentum, it will eventually dictate the sustainability of investing itself.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
