Intra-fund advice not immune to cost pressures

industry funds cooper review FOFA government australian securities and investments commission financial advice trustee

20 October 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

Analysis from Citigroup has highlighted the fact that providers of intra-fund advice will not be immune to cost pressures if the Government is successful in expanding the definition of intra-fund advice.

The Citigroup analysis points to a ‘considerable expansion’ of the definition and scope of intra-fund advice since the introduction of the original, narrow definition given by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

The proposed expansion of the definition to include advice on topics such as transition to retirement strategies, as well as an expectation that super funds will proactively deliver these services, will ultimately drive up costs.

“The Government appears set on expanding the scope of topics that can be covered by intra-fund personal advice. Both the Future of Financial Advice [FOFA] policy statement and the Cooper Super System Review assume a broader definition than currently defined by ASIC,” the report stated.

The FOFA reforms seek to allow intra-fund advice to extend to transition-to-retirement and other strategies, as well as retirement planning generally. The Cooper Review recommended the expansion of intra-fund advice into the realm of “more expensive personal advice”. The Cooper panel also suggested intra-fund advice be provided to super fund members every five years on average, reaching a total of 14 pieces of advice over the life of super fund membership.

Citi’s analysts said these projections, and the expansion of the scope of advice, would result in an increase in the cost of the advice. This calls into question the ability of funds implementing the MySuper proposals to reach fee levels of 66 basis points (at a scale of $20 billion).

The report stated that the costing of advice contained in the Cooper Review was based on Deloitte analysis, which the Citi analysts believe was based on ASIC’s original, narrow definition, rather than the proposed expanded definition. The Deloitte analysis also refers to circumstances in which fund members seek out advice, as opposed to a proactive stance from the trustee.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

20 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

5 days 1 hour ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 3 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 23 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

3 days 2 hours ago