Insurance agents want flexibility on personal advice

insurance Insurance Council of Australia productivity commission

21 March 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

General insurance agents want to be granted more flexibility to provide tailored information to consumers without triggering the personal advice rules.

In a submission filed with the Productivity Commission, the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has described the current regulatory regime around personal advice as “expensive and time-consuming” and something better suited to investment products than general insurance.

“The current regulatory regime around personal advice is expensive and time consuming,” it said. “This may be necessary for investment products, but seems overly cumbersome for general insurance.”

It said that, as a consequence, the majority of general insurance was sold on a ‘no advice’ business model, or where advice was provided, care was taken that it fell within the less onerous definition of ‘general advice’.

“The difference between information that is personal advice, general advice and factual information can be minute; a single word in some circumstances.,” the submission said. “Compliance with the financial advice regime therefore inevitably focuses training for employees and agents on phrasing information so as to allow them to remain within the definition of the advice model they are operating under, rather than on delivering information that is of the most assistance to the consumer’s inquiry.”

“This can produce counterintuitive conversations driven by compliance needs rather than consumer needs,” it said. “For example, in circumstances where product options have been explained and the consumer asks direct and personal questions such as ‘what should I do?’ it is difficult and counterintuitive not to personalise the response.”

The submission claimed that insurers also struggled to answer questions where consumers were seeking to validate a decision and said that once an insurer started to prioritise the types of information provided to individuals, questions about whether advice was being provided were triggered.

“The industry is not commonly called upon to provide complex advice. However, the fear of triggering the legal definition of personal advice hinders insurers from being more forthcoming in the guidance they provide. This results in a detrimental outcome for both industry and consumers.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS