Insto-owned AFSL compromises advice
Having an institutionally owned Australian financial services license (AFSL) can comprise everything from the advice clients receive to the product advisers sell, one financial adviser believes.
Owner and principal of Aon Hewitt-backed EZI Protect, Mick Sykes, said he would not like to see advisers going down the path of institutionally owned AFSLs as they are bound their approved product lists (APL).
"Where I stand, Aon is not an institutionally-owned organisation, so that gives us more flexibility to choose who's on our APL," he said.
"But if it's an institutionally owned thing, then maybe that institution's product is always going to be on there.
"It's a little bit like multi nationals buying farms so they can control everything from the milk production through to what goes on the shelf," he said.
But general manager of finance and wealth management at Ausingroup Mark Morcos said there has got to be a framework on what qualifies on the APLs.
"There's got to be a process that you go by in order to get any product on the APL or to get approved by the investment committee," he said.
"It's not just like you can put anything on the APL. There are rules and regulations on what you can and can't put on the APL from an AFSL point of view."
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
