Institutional ownership myth destroyed by ASIC data
The myth of institutional domination of financial advice has been exploded by data collected by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) which reveals AMP and the ‘big four' banks only control 39 per cent of financial advisers.
The data also shows that total institutional control of financial advisers is only at 48 per cent and that total planner numbers in the retail advice sector are at 22,500.
The numbers are drawn from the ASIC Financial Adviser Register and show there are 1220 Australian Financial Services Licence holders offering financial advice listed on the register with AMP and the banks holding 21 of those licences and 8533 advisers, or 39.2 per cent of all advisers on the register.
A further 18 licences are held by institutions with a total of 2008 planners under those licences, totalling 10541 planners, or 48.4 per cent of advisers in the register operating under institutions.
These numbers match closely to the Money Management 2014 Top 100 Dealer Group survey data which found that AMP and the banks had 9022 planners in 2014 while all institutions had 10851 planners in 2014, both of which were down from 2013.
The ASIC adviser register indicates there are around 3000 planners working under licences that have 10 planners or less, around 5300 planners working under licences that have 11-100 planners and 14200 working under licences that have 100 or more advisers. This latter group are concentrated within 50 planning groups, with the average number of advisers across those 50 group at 285, with the average number of planners per licence across the total register at 18.
AUTHOR
Jason Spits
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
