ING calls for super overhaul

australian financial services trustee superannuation funds cooper review financial services licence

11 November 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

ING has called for a major overhaul of longstanding components of superannuation in its submission to the Cooper Review.

Among its recommendations, ING canvassed the removal of the existing trust/trustee structure for super, claiming there were questions about the appropriateness of the model “given the nature of today’s public offer and other large super funds”.

“In an environment where most superannuation funds provide a level of investment choice, there is scope to question the relevance of the trust model for superannuation,” ING’s submission stated.

One option, according to ING, would be to allow providers to move to a model without a superannuation trust and trustee.

“In practical terms, we believe there is merit in allowing [Australian Financial Services Licensees] to offer a financial product for both superannuation and managed investment purposes,” ING stated.

The group said product rules for superannuation could be managed by the Australian Financial Services Licence, meaning consumer protection and prudential supervision were not diluted.

However, the group did note that “mandatory removal of the superannuation trust … may be disruptive for some and may not be justifiable”.

In its submission ING also suggested a removal of the work test and rationalisation of the preservation rules.

ING said while the work test is relatively easy to administer, it is a test that “catches out clients and advisers every year”, and sees clients enter “notional employment arrangements” solely to facilitate a superannuation contribution.

Super fund members must satisfy gainful employment work tests in order to contribute to super from age 65 to age 75.

ING also called for simplification of the preservation rules as the development of super over the years meant few members would still be affected by the preservation rules.

“Any rationalisation would be to split a person’s benefits into preserved and non-preserved components as at a particular date without the need to refer to those rules, which have little application for the vast majority of fund members,” ING said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

6 days 12 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS