Industry’s anti-money laundering fears calmed

financial services industry IFSA insurance federal government ifsa chief executive financial planning association financial planners superannuation industry chief executive fund managers life insurance real estate

13 September 2005
| By Ross Kelly |

The financial services industry says the Federal Government has gone a long way to arresting fears that any proposed anti-money laundering legislation would heap unfathomable costs on banks, insurance agents, fund managers and financial planners.

The Minister for Justice and Customs, Chris Ellison, held a meeting recently with senior figures of the financial services industry, including the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA), the Financial Planning Association and the Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA), to discuss the progress of draft anti-money laundering legislation, which the Government obliged itself to produce after agreeing to adopt international standards in 2003.

Financial services, real estate, gem and precious metal, and casino businesses are all particularly concerned by the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force’s “know your client” recommendation, which requests businesses that routinely take large deposits of money to keep a database of their clients’ personal details.

IFSA welcomed Ellison’s support of the adoption of a “risk-based” approach to handling the issue, so industry sectors where the risk of terrorists attempting to launder money may be lower, such as in the life insurance or superannuation industry, would have their requirements scaled down.

“We say only the industry can identify what those risks are,” said IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert.

He said the Government was also receptive to its request to let the industry develop its own codes, which would operate under legislation that covers broader issues, rather than forcing the industry to adopt more specific requirements.

“The legislation must recognise that any proposals must be commercially savvy. If we don’t and we impose unreasonable burdens, the terrorists would have won — they would have affected the capital system.”

A spokesperson for the ABA added that the Minister had also shot down concerns that the industry would be forced to identify clients already identified under the Financial Transaction Reports Act (FTRA).

Anyone who opens a bank account is already identified under FTRA legislation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 days 22 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 days 2 hours ago