Industry welcomes ASIC's approach to fee disclosure

financial-planning/industry-super-network/FOFA/ASIC/association-of-financial-advisers/brad-fox/financial-planning-industry/financial-advisers/chief-executive-officer/financial-advice/future-of-financial-advice/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/FPA/director/

29 January 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The financial planning industry has welcomed the new regulatory guidance on fee disclosure, though some argue it should have applied only to new clients.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released a regulatory guide which outlines the requirements around fee disclosure statements for retail clients who pay ongoing fees to their financial advisers.

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) director of policy and standards, Dante De Gori, said the association was delighted to see ASIC take a "common sense" approach, especially with respect to the 'no-action' clause.

The no-action clause, which was not included in other parts of Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) guidance, will allow ASIC to provide more flexibility around some of the rules. 

"For example, the fee disclosure date will be the anniversary date for the client," De Gori said.

"There are going to be circumstances where you're not going to know the anniversary date, so ASIC is not going to take action for that - for example when you're buying a book of clients," he added.

"We're very happy that ASIC has taken that on board and put that in the guidance document."

However, both De Gori and the Association of Financial Advisers chief executive officer Brad Fox have expressed concerns about how the fee disclosure statement requirements will be applied to pre-existing clients.

"There remains a bigger picture concern around how this is to be applied to pre-existing clients prior to introduction of FOFA," Fox said.

"There is an enormous amount of system re-work required at an enormous cost - we have real concerns about whether this can be in place by 1 July, 2013."

De Gori said the FPA still thought the fee disclosure statement requirements should apply only to new clients.

"There's potential duplication of disclosure that goes to clients that could be confusing - some of the main admin issues all apply to existing clients," De Gori said.

"It's just caused unnecessary complication and unnecessary uncertainty for the industry - if it was just for new clients, it wouldn't be that costly and would be quite clear."

The Industry Super Network (ISN) has expressed its support for ASIC's new guide, saying transparency around financial planner remuneration was key.

"It is reasonable that clients understand the services they are paying for where an ongoing fee is being charged," said the ISN chief executive officer David Whiteley.

"These measures in the Future of Financial Advice reforms are filling a regulatory gap to ensure that much needed disclosure is provided to all clients, both existing and new."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS