Industry unity on planning tax concessions
The financial services industry appears to be grouping behind a push to have tax concessions apply to financial advice, with the InstituteofChartered Accountantsin Australia (ICAA) now backing the prospect.
The ICAA announced this week that it had long held a position in relation to financial advice being made a tax concession for advisers using a fee-for-service model and was pleased with the positions taken by Financial Planning Association and the Industry Super Network.
The ICAA’s manager of financial planning and superannuation, Hugh Elvy, said the application of tax concessions to financial planning had been a feature of the organisation’s recent pre-Budget submissions because the institute believed it would make financial planning advice more affordable and would ultimately lead to wider access by many more Australians.
“The fact that commission-based financial advice attracts the tax advantage while advice given by fee-for-service advisers does not is an obvious problem currently facing the industry,” Elvy said.
“If tax advantages are placed on fee-for-service advice it will go a long way to improving the professionalism of the financial planning industry and the trust between financial advisers and their clients,” he said.
Elvy said it was important for the industry and government to continue to work closely to ensure that the financial advice gained from the fee-for-service remuneration structure could be offset by the client at tax time.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.