Industry must determine best remuneration method

financial services industry remuneration best interests advice government

7 June 2006
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |

The Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, Chris Pearce, has indicated the Government will not intervene with prescriptive legislation as to whether fee or commission based remuneration structures are most appropriate for the industry, and as such the financial services industry must resolve the issue itself.

At an Investment and Financial Services Association member luncheon he said: “I feel strongly it is not an issue for the Government. It is not our position to dictate to the industry about how you will be paid. I believe very strongly that is a decision for you as an industry to make.

“I think it is an issue you do need to sort out quickly. I welcome the debate and I wholeheartedly encourage you to approach this debate with a level head and with the best interests of consumers and the sector at heart,” Pearce added.

While he declared the Government would have no involvement in resolving the deliberation either way, he emphasised the importance of making sure remuneration methods were closely related to the value of advice provided.

“I think increasingly your clients, and I see this as an emerging trend more and more, are more directly matching the value of the advice you give with how much they pay for it,” Pearce said.

“Whether they pay for advice up front, or later through commission structures, investors do need to feel that they are getting value for money in my view,” he added.

According to Pearce, another important issue for the industry to be mindful of was managing the expectations of consumers, as many complaints regarding the sector centred on a feeling from clients that the service they received was not what they had anticipated.

He felt the key to addressing the situation was through greater consumer education.

“Poor consumer knowledge and understanding is an issue the industry does need to deal with simply because it affects the way your products are perceived,” Pearce said.

He thought the Financial Services Reform Act (FSR) also had a part to play here.

“That’s what’s been driving me to improve FSR. To make sure that the information consumers get is the information that they need, the information they will actually read, and therefore the information they will actually take in and remember,” Pearce explained.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS