Industry hurt by infighting

financial planning industry commissions federal government superannuation funds financial planners chief executive financial services association association of financial advisers FPA industry funds AFA financial advisers government

16 July 2009
| By Mike Taylor |

Internecine squabbling on the part of groups of financial planners is serving to undermine the broader interests of the financial planning industry, according to the chief executive of the Financial Planning Association (FPA), Jo-Anne Bloch.

On the same day Bloch led the industry in bitterly criticising the intra-fund advice arrangements sanctioned by the Federal Government, she agreed that the interests of financial planners were being undermined by internal squabbling and jealousies.

“The key messages our industry is trying to deliver to the Government on policy are being undermined by some of the squabbling that occurs, some of which is motivated by jealousy and self-interest,” she said.

Bloch said she believed there was a need for those operating in the financial planning industry to accept its structure and diversity and speak with a single voice.

“Except on the issue of the importance of the value of advice, our industry is not speaking with that single voice,” she said.

The chief executive of the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA), Richard Klipin, agreed that the efforts of the financial planning industry had proved ineffective when compared with those of the industry funds.

“There is no question that the industry funds have done better in maintaining their key messages — I think it is something which they learn early in terms of prosecuting industrial relations agendas,” Klipin said.

“There certainly needs to be more clarity of voice on the part of our industry if we are to get our messages across.”

The fractured nature of the financial planning industry became evident when the FPA announced its proposals for the phasing out of commissions-based advice, and was reinforced by the Federal Government’s ultimate decision with respect to the provision of intra-fund advice by superannuation funds.

However, the Federal Government’s intra-fund advice decision actually generated a united approach from the AFA and the FPA, with both organisations strongly condemning the move and agreeing that it would undermine the quality and consistency of advice.

The intra-fund advice arrangements also drew a clear line in the sand between the interests of the financial advice lobby and the organisations representing superannuation funds and master trusts, with the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia and the Investment and Financial Services Association both welcoming the Government’s move.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 days 23 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 days 3 hours ago