Industry funds tout infrastructure as differentiator
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ff89/1ff89e68e4f2ea030f8be6738bbb68daa6ec0267" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ff89/1ff89e68e4f2ea030f8be6738bbb68daa6ec0267" alt="image"
The Industry Super Network (ISN) has claimed exposure to infrastructure and unlisted assets has been a vital performance differentiator between industry and retail superannuation funds.
Amid continuing discussion about the role of super fund investment in infrastructure, ISN chief economist Dr Sacha Vidler (pictured) said the outperformance and reduced volatility of unlisted assets has been an important source of competitive difference for industry funds.
He added it was a vital factor in their impressive investment performance.
ISN used figures from Chant West on growth funds from 2009 to indicate that retail funds only allocated 9 per cent of their portfolio to unlisted assets while industry funds allocated 28 per cent.
“This different approach to asset allocation has proved to be a vital performance differentiator for industry super funds as unlisted assets have both outperformed most other asset classes and also been less volatile,” Vidler said.
Vidler said that during the global financial crisis, unlisted property and unlisted infrastructure experienced a shorter and shallower downturn than the precipitous crash that occurred in listed markets.
However, one industry fund, MTAA Super, had a high exposure to unlisted assets and has recently been the subject of scrutiny over investment performance.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.