Industry funds cite ASIC, FASEA and Hume on intrafund advice


Industry superannuation funds have expressed confidence that they can deliver limited scope advice in a totally compliant manner citing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) and the minister, Senator Jane Hume.
Answering questions on notice from the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, Industry Fund Services (IFS) said it was confident that limited scope advice “can be delivered in a compliant manner”.
NSW Liberal backbencher, Jason Falinksi had suggested during committee hearings that IFS believed there was a way around the best interest test, something that IFS denied.
In its response to Falinski’s question on notice, IFS cited the fact that “ASIC has guidance on foot (RG244) on the steps required to deliver limited scope advice, and FASEA has directly addressed the issue (FG002) stating that ‘A limited scope engagement can be a highly effective tool to provide clients who have limited means or resources to access comprehensive advice’”.
IFS also noted that ASIC’s Report 639 Financial advice by superannuation funds examined a sample of intra-fund and scaled advice provided by superannuation funds.
“The majority of that advice was compliant with s961B, 961G and 961J of the Corporations Act. ASIC provided additional tips to trustees and advice providers to ensure compliant scaled advice and intrafund advice.
“In April ASIC granted relief to trustees delivering scoped advice in relation to early release of superannuation, including a no action approach where trustees provide this advice through a collective charging (intra-fund) model.
“The FASEA chief executive was reported as providing assurance to an SMSF Association webinar that limited scope advice can be compliant with the FASEA Code of Ethics and Senator Hume is reported to have recently called for industry to offer more scaled and single issue advice, calling for ‘a far more prominent role for single issue advice’,” the IFS answer said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.