Industry funds argue LIF is 'relatively feeble'
Industry superannuation funds have told a Senate Committee that the Government's legislation underpinning the Life Insurance Framework is 'relatively feeble' when it is compared to the approach recommended by both the Financial System Inquiry and the Trowbridge Report.
What is more, the industry funds have warned the committee that the legislation has still failed to eliminate the "opportunity for payments from life insurers to advisers".
The criticisms are contained in a submission from the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee inquiry into the Corporations Amendment (Life Insurance Remuneration Arrangements) Bill 2016.
The submission argues that the provisions in the Bill are "relatively feeble compared to the approach recommended by both the Financial System Inquiry and the Trowbridge Report".
"We note that the Financial System Inquiry, which recommended banning upfront commissions, whilst the Trowbridge inquiry recommended eventual transition to an initial advice payment (IAP) and level commissions of 20 percent of premiums," the submission said.
"We note that this Bill will still provide the opportunity for payments from life insurers to advisers and consequently, we do not support the provision to allow the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC ) to make criteria that allows for these payments.
The AIST submission urged the inclusion of a sunset clause "to ensure that it is eventually phased out, along with commissions, generally".
Recommended for you
David Sipina has been sentenced to three years under an intensive correction order for his role in the unlicensed Courtenay House financial services.
As AFSLs endeavour to meet their breach reporting obligations, a legal expert has emphasised why robust documentation will prove fruitful, particularly in the face of potential regulatory investigations.
Betashares has named the top Australian suburbs with the highest spare cash flow, shining a light on where financial advisers could eye out potential clients.
A relevant provider has received a written direction from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after a superannuation rollover resulted in tax bill of over $200,000 for a client.
