Industry exclusion faces recalcitrant planners
Exclusion from the industry represents the major sanction facing financial advisers under the new Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime.
The FASEA released the Legislative Instrument covering the code of conduct elements of the regime today, noting that the most serious sanction that could be imposed by a monitoring body was exclusion from coverage of the monitoring body’s compliance scheme.
Given that every planner will need to be a member of a code monitoring body, that would represent exclusion from the industry.
It is expected that the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) or a combination of both will be part of the code monitoring arrangements covering planners.
The explanator memorandum attaching to the Legislative Instrument said code monitoring bodies would have the power to investigate breaches and potential breaches of the Code, and impose sanctions set out in their compliance schemes if they determine that a breach had occurred.
It said potential sanctions that a compliance scheme might provide for included
• a warning or reprimand; and
• requiring the relevant planner to undertake additional training or counselling; and
• requiring additional supervision on a relevant provider; and
• requiring specified corrective action; and
• requiring an independent compliance audit of the relevant provider (if it is a licensee); and
• requiring the relevant provider to provide the services to the retail client again at no cost, or to reduce or waive fees.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
