Industry divided on super portability

superannuation-funds/association-of-superannuation-funds/self-managed-superannuation-funds/federal-government/government/ifsa-chief-executive/chief-executive/IFSA/financial-services-association/

22 September 2003
| By External |

Australia’sindustry based superannuation funds have strongly rejected what they regard as the Federal Government’s “pre-emption of due process” by regulating for superannuation portability.

Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia(ASFA) chief executive Philippa Smith described the Government’s move as “extraordinary” in circumstances where a Senate Committee had been concurrently dealing with the issue.

“And it is possible that the Government might have kicked an own goal because I would have thought that the Senate would have no choice now but to disallow the regulations,” she says.

Smith says she regarded the Government’s announcement, which occurred at the same time as the matter was being heard by a Senate Committee, as “a pre-emption of process”.

However, the Government’s move was welcomed by theInvestment and Financial Services Association(IFSA), which described the initiative as timely, and with more than adequate consumer protections.

IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert says the regulations quite properly deliver consumer sovereignty and this is welcome at a time when there has been ongoing concerns expressed about fees and charges.

The Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasure, Senator Helen Coonan, announced last Thursday that the Government had gazetted regulations to give effect to its portability of superannuation policy.

The main features of the regulations were that portability should apply to accumulation funds and fully funded defined benefits funds where a member has ceased employment with the employer sponsor of the fund.

However, portability would not be applied to unfunded public sector superannuation schemes, self-managed superannuation funds and benefits being paid as a pension.

Smith says the regulations, as gazetted, seemed likely to create more superannuation accounts rather than fewer and it was inappropriate to be talking about portability without, at the same time, talking about choice of fund.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 day 8 hours ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

6 days 6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND