Industry divided on super portability

superannuation funds association of superannuation funds self-managed superannuation funds federal government government ifsa chief executive chief executive IFSA financial services association

22 September 2003
| By External |

Australia’sindustry based superannuation funds have strongly rejected what they regard as the Federal Government’s “pre-emption of due process” by regulating for superannuation portability.

Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia(ASFA) chief executive Philippa Smith described the Government’s move as “extraordinary” in circumstances where a Senate Committee had been concurrently dealing with the issue.

“And it is possible that the Government might have kicked an own goal because I would have thought that the Senate would have no choice now but to disallow the regulations,” she says.

Smith says she regarded the Government’s announcement, which occurred at the same time as the matter was being heard by a Senate Committee, as “a pre-emption of process”.

However, the Government’s move was welcomed by theInvestment and Financial Services Association(IFSA), which described the initiative as timely, and with more than adequate consumer protections.

IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert says the regulations quite properly deliver consumer sovereignty and this is welcome at a time when there has been ongoing concerns expressed about fees and charges.

The Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasure, Senator Helen Coonan, announced last Thursday that the Government had gazetted regulations to give effect to its portability of superannuation policy.

The main features of the regulations were that portability should apply to accumulation funds and fully funded defined benefits funds where a member has ceased employment with the employer sponsor of the fund.

However, portability would not be applied to unfunded public sector superannuation schemes, self-managed superannuation funds and benefits being paid as a pension.

Smith says the regulations, as gazetted, seemed likely to create more superannuation accounts rather than fewer and it was inappropriate to be talking about portability without, at the same time, talking about choice of fund.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 4 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 19 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

23 hours 53 minutes ago