Industry conflicted over IMAs
Individually managed accounts (IMA) are just an investment process for some industry members, but others believe they could surpass the popularity of managed funds in 10 years.
The latter view was supported by the co-founder of a boutique investment firm Wealth Within, Dale Gillham (pictured), who predicted an increasing number of people in the financial services industry would slowly shift to non-unitised options.
“Clients want more transparency and more control, so they don’t get as much with managed funds,” said Gillham. “Therefore, the move is towards these individually managed accounts,” he added.
Gillham’s comments came after Wealth Within signed up its first dealer group to white label its IMA service, with another deal on the horizon.
However, Asgard head Craig Lawrenson said individually managed accounts were merely an investment management process, and that they complemented, rather than rivalled, managed funds.
“The concept of IMA is the fact that you individually managing it; it’s bespoke … which is why it tends to be a high-net-worth proposition,” Lawrenson said.
“I guess SMAs [separately managed accounts], you can argue, are an alternative to a managed fund, because you are outsourcing to a third party manager and it could be manager X,” he added.
Gillham agreed IMAs could complement managed funds, but added they also had the potential to take money out of the sector.
“We’re talking about both things because IMAs give people beneficial ownership of the share, so does the SMA, whereas a managed fund doesn’t,” he said.
Gillham said investors would drive the change, rather than financial advisers.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
