Industry codes need 'radical surgery'
The industry's existing codes of conduct will require "pretty radical surgery" before the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is likely to deem them sufficient, says Mallesons senior associate Michael Mathieson.
Under the amended Future of Financial Advice legislation, beginning in 2015 financial advisers will be exempt from the opt-in provisions if they sign up to an ASIC-approved code of conduct.
The codes of conduct will be approved by ASIC if they are deemed to obviate (ie, render unnecessary) the opt-in obligations.
"If you're asking 'how can a code make the opt-in requirement unnecessary?' you need to ask the question: what's the purpose of the requirement?" Mathieson said.
The original explanatory memorandum says the purpose of the ongoing fee arrangement provisions is to ensure that advisers don't charge open-ended fees where the client is receiving little or no service, he said.
"How can a code of conduct ensure that advisers don't charge open-ended fees without also providing a service? That's going to be a very difficult question for ASIC to answer," he said.
The easiest solution would be for an industry body to include an opt-in obligation in its code of conduct, Mathieson said, (tongue-in-cheek).
More realistically, what ASIC might be looking for is "a genuine fee-for-service requirement that's somehow imposed on the adviser", Mathieson said.
But that would be much harder to police than a "black and white" opt-in requirement, he added.
"It imposes a real burden on ASIC, both as to whether to approve codes and what it will require in codes. ASIC would require pretty extensive powers relating to oversight, compliance and enforcement," Mathieson said.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
