Industry broadly critical of Budget
 
 
                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
                            The Federal Budget has received a broadly negative response from the financial services industry, with financial planning, accounting and superannuation bodies lamenting the impact of a range of changes.
Amongst the most forceful critics was the Institute of Public Accountants, which was strongly critical of what it described as the increased regulatory burden on accountants resulting from self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) auditor arrangements.
At the same time, the Institute of Public Accountant’s chief executive, Andrew Conway, hit out at the Government’s decision to reduce the superannuation tax concessions for those earning up to $300,000.
Partner with global legal firm DLA Piper, Heather Gray was also critical of the Budget measures delaying concessional contribution cap changes and cuts to the concessional treatment of higher income earners.
She said both measures would serve to create greater uncertainty among Australians, particularly those approaching retirement.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) expressed concern at the direction of the Budget and called for a parliamentary inquiry into the mobility of tax effective investments.
ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos said: "Making small changes at the edges to gain revenue for short-term political gain does not contribute to the development of long-term sustainable retirement incomes policy.
"The issue with changes to taxation settings is that they drive behavioural change,” she said.
“A parliamentary inquiry would get all political sides together to develop a unified, long-term approach to retirement incomes, and their tax settings, going forward.”
The Budget even earned a rebuke from the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), which warned older workers would have less opportunity to build their a href="http://www.moneymanagement.com.au/tag/retirement">retirement savings and many other Australians could be left confused about their superannuation following the introduction of the changes.
AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds said that while the Budget measures would not affect everyone, there was no doubt that the constant tinkering with the superannuation rules created enormous uncertainty “and could see more people give up on super and look to other forms of investment to save for retirement”.
Recommended for you
The top five licensees are demonstrating a “strong recovery” from losses in the first half of the year, and the gap is narrowing between their respective adviser numbers.
With many advisers preparing to retire or sell up, business advisory firm Business Health believes advisers need to take a proactive approach to informing their clients of succession plans.
Retirement commentators have flagged that almost a third of Australians over 50 are unprepared for the longevity of retirement and are falling behind APAC peers in their preparations and advice engagement.
As private markets continue to garner investor interest, Netwealth’s series of private market reports have revealed how much advisers and wealth managers are allocating, as well as a growing attraction to evergreen funds.
 
							 
						 
							 
						 
							 
						 
							 
						

 
							