Industry body calls for tighter use of 'adviser' title
An industry body is urging for a revision of how the term ‘adviser’ is used, arguing that those using the term should be subject to the same scrutiny and regulatory requirements as financial advisers.
The Association of Financial Advisers’ (AFA) chief executive, Richard Klipin, has told the Treasury it should limit usage of the term to those who are being regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and who must adhere to the Corporations Act.
“The problem at the moment is that anyone offering ‘advice’ in a financial space, including accountants, mortgage brokers and real estate agents, can call themselves an ‘adviser’,” Klipin said, adding this creates confusion for the consumer.
“In the interests of better serving the consumer, anyone using the term [adviser] should be subject to the same intense scrutiny and have to adhere to the same strict regulatory requirements as financial advisers,” Klipin said.
“Those who can’t have not earned the right to call themselves advisers.”
Klipin added that an adviser’s role from a legal perspective is to “provide ‘appropriate advice’ based on a client’s circumstances and objectives, in a clear, concise and effective manner”.
Earlier this month, the AFA announced the creation of a government and policy committee designed to communicate its members’ interests to the Government and the regulator.
The committee will consist of AFA members and other industry experts and will work on key issues facing advisers and their clients, including the provision of advice relating to superannuation and insurance, and lobby on government policies in the interest of clients.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
