Industry backs recommendation to scrap ban on exit fees

government and regulation government mortgage choice chief executive australian securities and investments commission

image
image
expand image

A Senate committee on competition in Australia’s banking sector has recommended the Government reconsider its proposed ban on exit fees, with much industry support.

The Senate’s Economic References Committee stated that rather than abolishing exit fees, it recommended the Government give the recent ban on unreasonable exit fees by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) a chance to work.

It also said it was notable that the only financial intermediaries that openly welcomed the ban of exit fees were the major banks.

Mortgage Choice chief executive Michael Russell strongly supported the committee’s recommendation on exit fees due to the unperceived adverse effects it would have on competition.

“Should the Gillard Government unilaterally ban exit fees, then it will unwittingly hand over on a plate the heads of the non-banks to the major banks.

“Why? They are reliant upon this fee to be able to remain competitive at the front end, where real competition counts for the consumer,” Russell said in Mortgage Choice’s submission to the Treasurer.

Mortgage provider FirstMac also welcomed the recommendations, with managing director Kim Cannon stating a ban on exit fees would likely create a class of ‘rate shoppers’ which would increase costs for all lenders, with costs passed on to consumers.

But Cannon said he did not agree with the senate committee’s further recommendation that if a ban were to be implemented, that it should only apply to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADI).

Cannon said he did not think it would create a truly level playing field, and it would erode the benefits of competition for consumers.

The Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia (MFAA) chief executive Phil Naylor (pictured) disagreed, stating if a ban on exit fees were to be introduced, small lenders should be exempt.

“The deferred establishment fee (which was considered an exit fee) brought down the margin on home loans for thousands of Australians,” he said.

“Lenders such as Aussie and Wizard used the deferred establishment fee to reduce mortgage costs and compete with the banks.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 2 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 days 13 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS