Illegal payment sees former minister disqualified as property trust director
Former Health Minister, Dr Michael Wooldridge, is one of five former directors of Australian Property Custodian Holdings Limited (APCH) who have been penalised by the Federal Court for breaching their responsibilities as directors.
The Judgement came after an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) investigation found that the five directors had breached their duties as directors by amending Prime Trust's constitution so a $33 million fee could be paid to the trust's founder, William Lionel Lewski.
While the court ruled that Lewski's conduct had been "central in Prime Trust's suffering a substantial loss", it found that Dr Wooldridge and directors, Mark Frederick Butler and Kim Jaques, had "capitulated to the interests of Mr Lewski", "rather than acting in the best interests of the members [of the trust]".
The Court ruled that the fifth director, Peter Clarke, had "sat passively" and "merely waved through a resolution which allowed a $33 million breach of trust".
The Federal Court delivered the following disqualifications and penalities:
Lewski — disqualified from managing a company for 15 years and fined $230,000
Wooldridge — disqualified from managing a company for two years and three months and fined $20,000
Butler — disqualified from managing a company for four years and fined $20,000
Jaques — disqualified from managing a company for four years and fined $20,000
Clarke — fined $20,000, but did not receive a disqualification.
The Court granted both Wooldridge and Lewski a stay on the implementation of the orders until 23 December 2014.
AUTHOR
Nicholas O'Donoghue
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
