IFAs should compete with the big banks
Independent financial advisors (IFAs) have an opportunity to counter the advice offerings of the big banks by proving the value and independence they can add, according to new research from GlobalData.
According to GlobalData wealth management analyst Heike van den Hoevel, recent Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) suggestions that banks have been pushing their own products should prompt IFAs to point to the breadth of their service proposition when reaching out to new customers.
The GlobalData 2017 IFA Survey, released this month, suggests only a handful of IFAs perceive competition from the big banks as a threat because the IFAs generally attract an older and more affluent client-base.
However, van den Hoevel said this did not mean IFAs could not broaden their target market and reach out to a wider demographic.
The survey showed a significantly larger proportion (54 per cent) of the Australian population had used a bank at some stage when arranging investments compared to only 38 per cent who had used an IFA.
However, the survey analysis pointed out that the main feature Australians were looking for when selecting an advisor was access to a wide range of investment options.
“That is in direct contrast to ASIC’s finding that banks continue to breach the ‘best interest duty’ and are more likely to recommend products manufactured by their parent companies, intentionally limiting customers’ options or withholding more suited alternative investment products,” the survey analysis said.
“Even demographics that are not typically drawn to IFAs will find themselves more likely to opt for independent advice when they learn their trusted banking partner has been pushing products that are not in their best interests,” it said. “The 15 per cent of IFAs that are independent of a product manufacturer should start aiming for a bigger slice of the pie by highlighting their two core strengths: unbiased advice and a wide product range.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
