Human impact of RC lost on Government

mental health Royal Commission

7 June 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Future Royal Commissions should consider the mental health impact of regulatory change and upheaval as the human impact on participants has been lost, according to clinical psychologist.

Max von Sabler had run his clinical practice, MVS Psychology Group, in Melbourne for eight years and said he had had treated numerous financial advisers during that time. He was also working on a PhD on the impact of change on professionals and how they could overcome that.

Advisers had been suffering acute stress disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, insomnia and excessive drinking, among others, he said. This echoed a survey published last month that 80% of advisers had seen significantly increased stress levels since the Royal Commission.

“In these Royal Commissions, everyone is painted with the same brush and it’s all publicised in the media. That means the ethical, responsible people are left to bear that burden,” he said.

“[Advisers] have been completely overwhelmed by all these regulatory changes and are so exhausted by the end of it. Some are unable to sit the exam because they have been so unwell and overwhelmed by the whole process and that means they will lose their licence as a result.

“The human impact of all this has been lost and the media and politicians have a big role to play in that. There was a loss of confidence and demoralisation as people were being discredited so for doing their job.”

While the circumstances had improved somewhat since the Royal Commission concluded and as the deadline for the financial adviser exam approached, von Sabler said there was still a lot of resentment present.

“It’s not as acute in the media anymore, it was quite shocking for people when they were waking up and reading those stories about themselves. But the significance was so big that people are still getting over it, they probably haven’t realised the real impact yet and are in denial.”

He said there had been inadequate planning by the Government to consider the flow-on effects of the changes. This included the impact of advisers’ families, relationships and staff as well the cost of providing benefits for people who were no longer able to work. He also highlighted the adviser exodus meant they were fewer advisers around to provide advice on this insurance.

“For Government, they need to consider the downstream impact to an adviser and their mental health, particularly those who are doing a good job. I don’t think there’s been adequate planning and thinking about insurance and who is going to carry the burden of unwell people, if not insurance companies.

“It’ll be NDIS, which is already falling apart, it’ll be work cover, it’ll be Medicare.”

If you are affected by any issues in this story, contact Lifeline on 13 11 44 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 days 10 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 days 14 hours ago