How research house competition is cutting licensee costs



Financial planning dealer groups are finding at least some cost-savings resulting from the exit of the major banks from the wealth management space, with competitive pressures mounting between the major funds management research houses and driving down prices.
Money Management is aware of competition for at least two major financial planning research mandates where the prices being quoted by research houses are more than 30% below what they were three years’ ago.
At the same time, independent investment consultants such as Evergreen have complained about the competitive behaviour exhibited by some of the major ratings houses.
Evergreen founder, Angela Ashton said that in recent months she had witnessed behaviour that some people might describe as “unethical”.
“What I am finding is that they are doing what they can to grow market share in a market which has decreased in size with the exit of the major banks,” she said.
SQM Research founder, Louis Christopher said that he had observed competitive pressure in a market that was already price-sensitive and in circumstances where few of the ratings houses could be said to cover the whole market.
“The research landscape has changed dramatically,” he said.
A senior licensee executive told Money Management that not only were the prices being quoted around the research mandates on offer more competitive but the level of add-ons and servicing had also increased.
“There seems to be a lot of tension in the market as they pursue the remaining significant mandates,” he said.
In Money Management’s most recent Rate the Raters research, Morningstar emerged as the best-regarded research house among financial advisers, followed by Lonsec and then Zenith.
Lonsec continues to have significant private equity ownership, while Zenith Investment Partners has been owned by private equity for more than a year. The other significant players in the research space are Morningstar, Mercer and SQM.
Recommended for you
The new financial year has got off to a strong start in adviser gains, helped by new entrants, after heavy losses sustained in June.
Michael McCorry, chief investment officer at BlackRock Australia, has detailed how investors are reconsidering their 60/40 portfolios as macro uncertainty highlight the benefits of liquid alternatives.
Having reset its market focus to high-net-worth advisers, Praemium’s administration solution has been selected by Bell Potter in a deal that increases the platform's funds under administration by $6 billion.
High transition rates from financial advisers have helped Netwealth’s funds under administration rise by $3.7 billion in the fourth quarter of FY25.