How research house competition is cutting licensee costs
Financial planning dealer groups are finding at least some cost-savings resulting from the exit of the major banks from the wealth management space, with competitive pressures mounting between the major funds management research houses and driving down prices.
Money Management is aware of competition for at least two major financial planning research mandates where the prices being quoted by research houses are more than 30% below what they were three years’ ago.
At the same time, independent investment consultants such as Evergreen have complained about the competitive behaviour exhibited by some of the major ratings houses.
Evergreen founder, Angela Ashton said that in recent months she had witnessed behaviour that some people might describe as “unethical”.
“What I am finding is that they are doing what they can to grow market share in a market which has decreased in size with the exit of the major banks,” she said.
SQM Research founder, Louis Christopher said that he had observed competitive pressure in a market that was already price-sensitive and in circumstances where few of the ratings houses could be said to cover the whole market.
“The research landscape has changed dramatically,” he said.
A senior licensee executive told Money Management that not only were the prices being quoted around the research mandates on offer more competitive but the level of add-ons and servicing had also increased.
“There seems to be a lot of tension in the market as they pursue the remaining significant mandates,” he said.
In Money Management’s most recent Rate the Raters research, Morningstar emerged as the best-regarded research house among financial advisers, followed by Lonsec and then Zenith.
Lonsec continues to have significant private equity ownership, while Zenith Investment Partners has been owned by private equity for more than a year. The other significant players in the research space are Morningstar, Mercer and SQM.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
