How many advisers passed the May exam?

ASIC exam FASEA

16 June 2023
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released the pass mark for this year’s May financial adviser exam.

Some 195 candidates sat the exam with a pass mark of 63 per cent, slightly down from 67 per cent in the February exams.

This equated to 122 candidates successfully passing.

ASIC said almost three-quarters (74 per cent) of the candidates in May were sitting the exam for the first time which was significantly higher than in February where 60 per cent were first-time candidates. 

The next exam would be held on 10 August and enrolments would open from 3 July-21 July.

To date 20,570 individual candidates had sat the exam and 92 per cent had passed. 

Of those who have passed:
•    Over 15,810 are recorded as current financial advisers on ASIC’s Financial Adviser Register (FAR);
•    Over 2,990 are ceased advisers on the FAR and may be re-authorised in the future; and
•    Over 950 passed while completing their professional year of work and training.

Click here to read Money Management's deep-dive into the pass rate of past exams and how they have changed over the years.

In March, ASIC made its first banning against an adviser for falsifying his exam results. In December 2021, Sydney-based Todd Karamian changed his financial adviser certificate from a fail result to a pass and sent the altered certificate to his licensee, Bluepoint Consulting.

Moreover, ASIC discovered that the adviser provided personal advice to 11 retail clients between 31 December 2021 to 9 September 2022 when he was not authorised to do so. 

He was prevented from providing any advice, managing an entity that carries on a financial advice firm or performing any role in a financial advice business. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Confused on Fri, 2023-06-16 12:01

So how many passed the May exam?

Submitted by Confused on Fri, 2023-06-16 12:03

So how many passed the May exam?

Submitted by Anon on Fri, 2023-06-16 12:59

Laura, can you please do a feature on why so many advisers have failed the exam (since its inception). I did the very first one (and passed). I'm not sure if the question set has evolved since then but it was largely an analysis of ethical biases with some questions testing knowledge of regulatory matters. Have the candidates that have not got through (and I know of advisers that have failed multiple times) failed on their basic understanding of ethical considerations (I appreciate that you're either ethical or you're not and passing a course in ethics does not make one ethical in nature) or is it a fundamental ignorance of the regulatory settings, or is it just some people are hopeless in an exam setting and freeze up? ASIC have probably already made up their minds on it but it would be good for the industry to know.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 10 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 14 hours ago