Home equity scheme cleared as advice option
The Centrelink Home Equity Access Scheme has been identified as a possible area of advice for advisers, having previously been thought of as a credit product.
The scheme, formerly known as the Pensions Loans Scheme, allowed older Australians to receive a voluntary non-taxable loan and use the equity in their property as security.
It was formerly restrictive in who could access it but recent changes meant it was now more accessible, including retirees who were otherwise ineligible for an Age Pension benefit.
Michael Miller, financial planner at Capital Advisory, sought clarification from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as to whether this was an option that financial advisers could explore in clients’ retirement plans.
Previously, he said, advisers were cautious about the product and the restrictions and unsure whether they could advise on them. He felt the Scheme would be suitable for retired clients who were “asset rich but cash poor” and who wanted to access assets tied up in their property.
“Many Australian Financial Service License (AFSL) holders had expressed caution about advising directly on the scheme, as it may have required an Australian Credit License (ACL) which was more typically held by mortgage brokers and other finance industry participants, than financial planners,” he said.
In response, ASIC stated: “As the Scheme is provided for under statute and not under a contract, these debts are not considered ‘credit contracts’ under the National Credit Act and therefore not regulated under the National Credit Act.
“We consider that financial advisers can advise on the Scheme without required an ACL, notwithstanding their functional equivalence to reverse mortgages that are regulated under the National Credit Act.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
I guess this would be counted as a mortgage by ASIC, so any advisers and centrelink staff would need accreditation?