Higher SG better than Henry options

ASFA superannuation funds superannuation guarantee association of superannuation funds government chief executive

4 May 2011
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) appears to have abandoned the notion of ‘soft compulsion’, arguing that voluntary savings beyond the superannuation guarantee (SG) will not succeed in delivering Australians a comfortable retirement.

In a report issued this week, ASFA concludes that compulsorily lifting the SG to 12 per cent is necessary because “the available evidence suggests” voluntary contributions will not achieve the desired outcomes.

ASFA policy had previously argued for “soft compulsion” as a means of dealing with Australia’s retirement incomes shortfall.

“Despite significant tax incentives for marking voluntary superannuation contributions, only around 20 per cent of employees do this,” the report said. “As well, the incidence of making salary sacrifice contributions only really begins to pick up after age 45.”

“Compulsory superannuation contributions are both needed and wanted. Leaving decisions about the level and timing of contributions to individuals would mean the great bulk of Australians would not make additional contributions,” it said.

The ASFA report suggested that for the minority of Australians that did make additional contributions, these would generally be made later in life when the impact on final retirement savings would be less.

In pointing to the report findings, ASFA chief executive, Pauline Vamos (pictured) said it confirmed that Australians would be better served by a lift in the compulsory SG than under the recommendations of the Henry Tax Review.

Indeed, the ASFA report analysis of the Henry Review pointed out that its recommendations were based on interactions with a proposed personal income tax system that was substantially different to the current one and which the Government had ruled out adopting.

As well, it said the Henry recommendations with respect to superannuation would result in substantial ongoing costs to tax revenue, individuals having to pay tax out of what was previously take-home pay, and administration complexity.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

1 month ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

1 month ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 2 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks 1 day ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS