High price paid for bad planner behaviour
The whole industry had been made to pay a price for the actions of whistleblowers associated with the Commonwealth Financial Planning enforceable undertaking and subsequent events, according to Financial Planning Association (FPA) chief executive, Mark Rantall.
Chairing a panel discussion on whistleblowing during the FPA congress in Adelaide, Rantall said there could be no question of the price which had been paid by the industry in terms of adverse publicity.
His comments came as Commonwealth FP whistleblower, Jeff Morris said that his actions in pointing out the problems to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and then going public in the media had changed his life and that he still believed whistleblower protections were not adequate to deal with the stress that would be experienced.
"From a whistleblower perspective there are no protections," Morris said. "I was simply cut loose to take care of myself."
Rockwell Olivier principal and lawyer, Peter Bobbin said he believed firms needed to accept that having whistleblowing policies in place represented a sub-set of ethics and something that needed to be supported fro the top down.
However, he said he believed that it was appropriate that firms retained external providers to deal with whistleblowing complaints because this made it easier for both the whistleblowers and the companies themselves.
"Having an external person to report to makes it easier and more appropriate," Bobbin said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
