Hedge fund definition presents a catch-all concern
The recently announced industry standard for defining a hedge fund presents a catch-all concern to unaware fund managers.
With the release of Regulatory Guide 240 'Hedge funds: improving disclosure', some fund managers may be shocked to find they are, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) definition, operating as a hedge fund, Zenith Investment Partners head of alternatives research Daniel Liptak said.
Some infrastructure, property, real estate and agricultural managed funds currently meet at least two of the five criteria that constitute a hedge fund, which includes any managed fund that uses leverage, derivatives and short-selling.
According to Liptak, funds that are flagged by ASIC may be treated differently by platforms.
"For investors there's two possible outcomes - they'll either run a mile or they'll say, 'well we've been in a hedge fund all this time and nothing has gone wrong', so it (the definition) could be a positive," he said.
The disclosure requirements themselves could also be a positive outcome for domestic operators because most will be able to meet the principles - albeit with minor changes to their existing systems - while offshore funds with large institutional clients may struggle.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
