Harts to battle ASIC in court
Financial services groupHarts Australasiahas said it will strenuously defend yesterday’s proposal to appoint a provisional liquidator to wind up the group by theAustralian Securities and Investments Commission(ASIC) when it comes before the courts next week.
Harts executive chairman, Steve Hart says ASIC's claims are based on what he believes are incorrect or incomplete information. In a company statement, Hart says when the group fronts court next week he is confident he will squash the latest blow to the group and be able to again focus on its growth strategies.
It is understood that Hart’s main concern about ASIC’s decision to bring in a provisional liquidator is that it will halt a number of transactions relevant to the group’s non-core asset sale program.
Hart says the sale of New Zealand assets, the disposal of the troubled property division and the finalisation of a loan facility were all to be signed or completed this week. But with ASIC stepping in, all deals will be delayed.
Hart also denied recent media comments that many Harts employees have not been paid for some months. Instead he pointed the finger elsewhere stating, he “firmly believed there is a determined attempt to undermine this company and I will not allow that to happen”.
Hart’s woes began earlier this month when the group reported a massive $92.7 million net loss after writing $62.9 million off the value of its investments and posting an operating loss of $17.5 million.
The company allocated a further $10.5 million for bad debts provisions and write-offs at June 30, 2001. The company's prospectus has forecast a net profit of $12 million.
The major creditors included accountants who had sold their firms to Harts over the last year.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
