GST increase placed on agenda
Australians should not be concerned about an increase in the Good and Services Tax, according to key accounting body CPA Australia, which has produced research suggesting it would result in the abolition of inefficient taxes and therefore boost productivity.
CPA Australia has released the findings of research conducted by KPMG Econtech examining the overall economic effect should the GST be increased by 12.5, 15 and 20 per cent respectively and how this might then fund the reduction or abolition of inefficient taxes.
It named some of those inefficient taxes as being insurance taxes, motor vehicle taxes, commercial conveyancing duty and payroll tax.
CPA Australia said the results showed that increases in the rate to 15 to 20 per cent respectively would deliver the greatest productivity growth and standard of living increases.
The research was produced by CPA Australia as part of its positioning ahead of the Government's forthcoming tax forum.
CPA Australia chief executive Alex Malley said the research highlighted the importance of reaching a broad consensus at the tax forum on the need to remove a range of inefficient taxes funded by other revenue sources.
"Our research helps demystify concerns that an increase in GST would hurt Australians," he said.
"If the forum is to set us on the path to significant tax reform, we must look at how we can eliminate many of the inefficient taxes Australian businesses face, and this includes a serious discussion on the GST," Malley said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
