Grass roots planners not sufficiently consulted

financial planning education consulting advisers

19 January 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

There has been a lack of consultation with grass roots advisers around the Government's proposals for lifting professional and ethical standards, according to experienced Victorian-based adviser, Ian McKenzie.

In a submission responding to the Government's exposure draft legislation on lifting professional and ethical standards in the financial services industry, McKenzie said he was concerned at the lack of consultation with grass roots advisers with respect to both the findings of the Financial System Inquiry and the Parliamentary Joint Committee.

Further he said there had been no economic or social impact done on the on the proposed legislation, especially with respect to its impact on the existing stock of financial advisers, small business or the wider community.

McKenzie's submission expresses deep concern that the changes being proposed by the Government may see a significant exodus of experienced advisers and urged grandfathering in similar terms to that being urged by both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

He said there was a real danger within the exposure draft legislation that adviser stocks would be damaged, undermining Australia's aspirations to become an Asian financial hub.

However it on the legislative proposal to establish a new over-arching standards-setting body that McKenzie is most vocal, arguing that it is unnecessary in circumstances where the Accounting Professional and Ethnical Standards Board (APESB) already exists.

He said the APESB had been formed by the three professional accounting bodies and should be possible for the financial planning bodies such as the FPA and AFA to join the APESB and effectively bring the accounting and financial planning professionals under a single code of conduct.

"Why spend millions of dollars setting up a new standards board when one already exists and probably covers around 75 per cent of financial services practitioners and probably most likely already has the infrastructure and human resources personnel in place to handle the codes of conduct of financial advisers," McKenzie's submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS