Govt warned on default fund monopoly
The Federal Government runs the risk of entrenching a significant monopoly in the superannuation industry if it proceeds to implement its Stronger Super policy proposals without at the same time addressing default funds under modern awards.
That is one of the key claims to emerge from a round-table conducted this week by Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, where most panellists agreed that the Assistant Treasurer, Bill Shorten, was taking a significant risk by pursuing the Stronger Super changes in the absence of addressing the default fund situation.
The industry has been expecting the minister to announce the Government's position with respect to Stronger Super within days, but one of the Super Review round-table participants - former Financial Services Council chief executive, Richard Gilbert - said to do so without addressing concerns around default funds risked "entrenching a massive monopoly in default superannuation".
He said he believed the Government should have acted to put the question of default funds before the Productivity Commission sooner, because current time scales meant any changes might trail the introduction of Stronger Super by as much as two years.
However, Sunsuper chief investment officer, David Hartley said opening up the default fund market needed to be accompanied by greater transparency around the fees that were being charged.
"If commercial operators are willing to operate on the same profit margin as industry funds then it's probably fair enough," he said.
Hartley said he was happy for commercial funds to do it (provide default superannuation funds) - as long as there was absolute clarity on what they were taking out.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
