Govt spotlight on borrowing in super

government superannuation funds capital gains tax superannuation industry income tax capital gains trustee

11 March 2010
| By Caroline Munro |
image
image
expand image

Government tax and consumer protection proposals made in recent days have put the spotlight on common industry practices around borrowing in super.

The Government has proposed changes to Corporations Regulations 2001 legislation to ensure that borrowing arrangements by superannuation fund trustees are considered financial products.

The proposal would see borrowing arrangements, such as instalment warrants, covered by the Government’s consumer protection framework.

“The measure will ensure that only licensed financial services providers offer these arrangements to superannuation funds,” said the Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen.

He noted that the Government has also proposed an amendment to the tax law so that a superannuation trustee who enters into a limited recourse borrowing arrangement to purchase an asset, as permitted under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), would be treated as the owner of the asset for income tax purposes.

“The changes will ensure that trustees of superannuation funds who have entered into permitted limited recourse borrowing arrangements will not face CGT [Capital Gains Tax] obligations at the time the last instalments are paid,” Bowen said.

Interestingly, Bowen commented that the Government is aware of “some areas of uncertainty” with regards to borrowing arrangements made under the SIS Act.

Vince Scully of Blackwattle Capital pointed to the common practice of banks taking personal guarantees.

Under the SIS Act, in order for an instalment warrant to be considered as such and be included in the Government’s new ‘look-through’ approach, there must be “a non-recourse borrowing by the investor and no other guarantee from the investor (or associates) to the lender”.

Scully said while this is in place, common practice by the banks is to seek personal guarantees from investors.

“They won’t qualify for the correct tax treatment,” Scully said, referring to the proposed tax changes. He said it appears the Government is well aware of current practice and more questions are now being asked about concerns surrounding a possible gap in legislation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS