Govt should focus on bank business models, says FSU

global financial crisis federal government

29 June 2010
| By Caroline Munro |
image
image
expand image

The Government has not addressed the fundamental fact that bank sales incentives are the root cause of high levels of debt in Australia, according to the Finance Sector Union (FSU).

“It is no surprise that we ended up with the global financial crisis (GFC),” said FSU national secretary Leon Carter. “It was a conscious decision by the banks to sell and push debt, and at this stage we don’t think there’s been anywhere near the level of scrutiny and debate about their business models.”

Carter said the FSU congratulated the Government on the introduction of the new National Consumer Credit laws, which are aimed at improving consumer protection in credit and loan transactions and making financial institutions more responsible

Carter said the reforms are the first step in the right direction but he added that the FSU believes they are missing the fundamental problem.

“Whilst it’s fantastic that they’re talking about not having predatory behaviour around responsible lending, they haven’t addressed the fact that the big four banks have performance reward systems that actually insist on and reward our [FSU] members for pushing debt onto customers,” Carter said.

“You’ve actually got to address the business models of the banks around the world, including Australia, which [are] about sales over service.”

He said the Consumer Credit Code should stipulate that credit provision should go to meeting the consumer’s needs.

“There shouldn’t be incentives that push debt onto people that is more than they can afford,” he said.

Carter said it is frustrating that, coming out of the GFC, the Federal Government and the G20 are prioritising debt as opposed to reforming the banks.

“We think it is a major step backwards,” he said. “Do people really think we’d have these debt levels if the banks weren’t allowed to do whatever the hell they wanted just to make a profit?”

Carter added that the Australian Government is incorrectly finding comfort in the fact that the big four banks have become more profitable through the GFC.

“We think that the Government is wrongly seeing that as a sign that nothing needs to change because our banks survived well. The debate is too often about the odd extreme behaviours rather than looking at the core business model that is being followed by banks around the world.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 days 1 hour ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 days 5 hours ago