Government succumbs on super rollovers
THEFederalGovernment has succumbed to concerted industry pressure and agreed to amend the tax laws to remove an anomaly that threatened to ‘double-count’ people’s superannuation assets for reasonable benefit limit (RBL) purposes.
The Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer Senator Helen Coonan announced last week the Government would amend the tax legislation to correct the anomaly, formed after a controversial Australian Taxation Office (ATO) decision.
In December last year, the ATO ruled that individuals who had taken a pension from their super fund but then subsequently decided to roll the pension back into an accumulation product in the same super fund, did not trigger a reportable event for RBL purposes.
This effectively meant that when those same individuals eventually took another pension from their super fund, they would have the value of the first pension added to the second for RBL purposes, potentially exposing them to a much higher tax rate when they inevitably breached the RBL.
The technical services manager at AM Corporation, Kim Guest, last week said the industry lobbied hard for the changes, which solved many of the dilemmas facing financial advisers with clients who were looking to roll pensions back into accumulation products in their super funds.
“The situation put a lot of advisers, especially those that advise on self-managed super, in a difficult position,” she says.
Senator Coonan said last week the amendments to the legislation, when introduced, would be backdated to July 1, 2001.
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled a Sydney AFSL for failing to pay a $64,000 AFCA determination related to inappropriate advice, which then had to be paid by the CSLR.
A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments for investments.
Inefficient data processes and systems mean advisers are spending over half of their time on product implementation and administration at the expense of clients, according to research.
With the regulator announcing its enforcement focus for 2025 last week, law firm Hall & Wilcox examines the areas which have dropped down the list in priority for the regulator.
