Government overestimating influence of rebates

dealer groups advisers director

14 September 2010
| By Benjamin Levy |

Government officials are completely overestimating the likelihood that volume rebates influence advisers to recommend certain products to clients, according to the director of Dealer Group Advisers (DGA), Andrew Wheeler.

In a survey by DGA, completed for the Treasury Department, only 16 out of 43 dealer groups surveyed were forwarding volume rebates on to their advisers. Of those 16 dealer groups, only three or four dealers, representing approximately 135 planning practices in total, were receiving amounts of $50,000 or more in rebates per practice a year, Wheeler said.

Wheeler estimated that these 135 planning practices employed no more than 500 advisers between them, meaning that each adviser only received $13,500 in rebates.

Of the other 12 or 13 dealer groups remaining who passed on volume rebates to their advisers, each planning practice would only receive between $3000 and $15,000 in rebates, split among three advisers, Wheeler said.

The rest of the 43 dealer groups in the survey did not pass on the volume rebates to their advisers at all, he said.

Each practice that received rebates had hundreds of clients between their advisers, meaning that each client would only be worth a few hundred dollars in rebates, which needed to be compared to the thousands of dollars received per client for ongoing advice, Wheeler said.

On an average client portfolio of $300,000, an adviser would only generate a rebate of $150 - $210 per client, when advisers were receiving at least $2000 and probably more as an ongoing advice fee, Wheeler said.

The survey suggested that the government was completely overestimating how much volume rebates advisers were receiving, and consequently, whether it was creating a bias among advisers towards certain rebate-producing investment products, Wheeler said.

Most of the rebates being received by dealer groups were from platform providers as a whole, not from particular investment products, and thus the rebates could not be said to be biasing the adviser towards a particular product, Wheeler added.

Wheeler said any volume rebates that a dealer group did receive should simply be disclosed to the client, and not banned. Disclosure would lead to dealer groups banning rebates themselves for fear that a client would protest, Wheeler said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 2 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks 1 day ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS