Government ignoring reverse mortgage story
Considering that the baby boomer generation will retire within the next 10 years and their superannuation investments have plunged, they may have no choice but to turn to the Government for help.
In such a situation, a reverse mortgage might be the right product to help retirees bridge the gap and lighten the pressure on government coffers. But the tightening credit market has left them unable to gain access to the funding they need — and the Government is not listening.
The Senior Australians Equity Release Association of Lenders (SEQUAL) called on the Federal Government to extend the stimulus package it offered to the forward mortgage market to include reverse mortgages, suggesting a number of ways the Government could support the reverse mortgage market — but it declined to participate, according to executive director Kevin Conlon.
John Thomas, chairman of Australian Senior’s Finance (ASF) and a chairman of SEQUAL, believes the Government’s view is short-sighted.
“A lot of clients … are looking at reverse mortgages to bridge the gap. But the lack of funding available means they are unable to satisfy their needs, and a lot of those people will have nowhere else to go but to look to government agencies,” Thomas said.
By their very nature, these retirees are keen and want to look after themselves, and they want to look at it as an alternative to the pension, he said.
“If they can’t get [a reverse mortgage], a pension is their only alternative.”
— Benjamin Levy
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
