Godfrey Pembroke adopts fee-for-service model
MLC-owned financial planning dealer group Godfrey Pembroke has announced it will move to a pure fee-for-service model for all of its new clients from October 1, 2006.
Godfrey Pembroke managing director Mark Rantall said the initiative, which was driven by the firm’s 170 advisers, is all about transparency and control for clients.
“It’s about transparency, because the client has a right to know how much they’ve paid, who they are paying it to, and what they are getting for what they pay,” he explained.
“It’s about control, because it’s about the client being able to have a relationship with an adviser, agree what the terms of engagement are, and be able to control the fees that they pay,” Rantall added.
Once the model is in place all Godfrey Pembroke advisers will have to either dial down or rebate any commissions associated with the products in which the client is investing, and replace them with a fee-for-service negotiated directly with the customer.
“The fee will be expressed as a dollar amount on the statement, but it can be negotiated as a percentage of funds under advice, a flat dollar amount, or whatever the adviser and client agree is relevant for their set of circumstances,” Rantall said.
Godfrey Pembroke’s new direction marks the second step taken by the MLC group to encourage a fee-for-service financial planning environment.
In March, the group launched a platform product containing zero commissions called MasterKey Fundamentals.
“Across our whole advisory network we’re helping our advisers transition to a fee model.
“We’re providing product that accommodates a fee model, and we’re providing business support that helps our advisers move to a fee model,” MLC chief executive Steve Tucker said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
