Go beyond PI says Choice

professional indemnity insurance professional indemnity insurance australian financial services financial planners financial planning association financial services licence financial adviser australian securities and investments commission government ASIC chief executive

28 November 2007
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Jo-Anne Bloch

Consumer advocacy group Choice is pushing both the Government and regulators to go further than professional indemnity insurance in terms of the obligations it wants imposed on financial planners and Australian Financial Services licence holders.

Choice wants the introduction of what it describes as a “compensation fund of last resort”, which it says is necessary to ensure that consumers who lose substantial sums are compensated.

Reacting to the release of a new regulatory guide by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission detailing compensation and insurance arrangements for AFS licensees, Choice spokesman Gordon Renouf said that even with the changes announced by the regulators, many consumers would face situations where their adviser had become insolvent and no insurance cover was available.

Further, he said that Choice was disappointed that licensees would not have to disclose the name of their professional indemnity insurer to consumers.

“Not knowing who the insurer is can delay or frustrate consumers’ efforts to obtain the compensation they are due where the financial adviser has gone out of business or absconded,” Renouf claimed.

For its part, the Financial Planning Association welcomed release of the ASIC regulatory guide with chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch saying it demonstrated an appreciation of the issues raised by the FPA and the complexities of the professional indemnity insurance market for financial planners.

She said the extension of the transition period over two years would greatly assist financial planners in sourcing appropriate professional indemnity cover.

Bloch said that ASIC’s decision to reduce professional indemnity cover requirements to equal company revenue would significantly reduce compliance costs while still providing adequate protection.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS