Give us more banning power says ASIC’s Medcraft
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16a4d/16a4d75490d0fd62a2e2ca1997893d512e8d9dd2" alt="power image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16a4d/16a4d75490d0fd62a2e2ca1997893d512e8d9dd2" alt="power image"
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) chairman, Greg Medcraft has reinforced the regulator’s desire to have increased banning powers covering people working in management positions in the financial services industry.
Medcraft has told Senate estimates he believes the power is “vitally important” in dealing with people in management roles within financial services companies.
“There is currently a review into ASIC's enforcement regime, including the issue of ASIC being able to ban people from managing firms providing financial services,” he said. “At the moment, we can only ban people from directly providing the services, not from managing that process.”
He said the present regime “might help deal with bad apples, but it doesn't tackle problems with the tree”.
“ASIC sees this power as vitally important,” Medcraft said. “It is crucial to the effectiveness of such a banning power that the trigger for banning people from management is appropriate. It won't be effective if we can only ban those that themselves have directly committed breaches of the law.”
“The role of managers should be to take reasonable steps to ensure compliance with the law by the people they are managing,” he said. “We need to be able to remove managers who seriously fail that standard and whose management failings have contributed to misconduct in a firm and thus losses to consumers.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.