Future of group purchasing bodies unclear

the fold legal regulation ASIC Alternatives australian securities and investments commission AFSL Australian financial services licence

9 March 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Organisations considering the use of a group purchasing body (GPB) could look to alternatives given the corporate watchdog has signalled the end of the GPB relief.

The Fold Legal said the current GPB relief might be replaced soon as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) had indicated that it would consult with the industry and other stakeholders in 2019 to decide what changes were required by the end of 2020, but this had not happened yet.

“ASIC also hasn’t updated or replaced Regulatory Guide 195 (group purchasing bodies for insurance and risk products) since 2010, so it can’t be relied on. In other words, things could change,” it said.

A GPB arranges or holds insurance or risk cover for its members but do not have to meet some legal requirements, such as holding an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL).

However, there are constraints such as GPBs cannot earn a profit and can only receive some very specific financial benefits for arranging the protection, and they are only able to recover their legitimate administrative costs and this means they are not able to average out their costs.

The Fold Legal noted that because of the restrictions, GPBs might be better placed to partner with an AFSL holder as an authorised representative or general insurance distributor.

The Fold Legal said: “As an authorised representative or general insurance distributor the GPB may be able to:

  • Agree a more flexible or lucrative commercial relationship with the AFSL holder;
  • ‘White-label’ the insurance if they’re an authorised representative. This means they can offer the product under their own branding; and
  • Earn profits or benefit financially from providing these services as long as they tell their members”.

The firm said if insurance was mandatory then there could be another option.

“Soon a deferred sales model will apply for add-on insurance products that are sold to retail clients. This means that a GPB will have to wait four days before offering a member an insurance product that is usually sold alongside another good or service,” it said.

“A GPB may avoid this if the insurance is not offered separately (by opting in) but is instead bundled as part of the benefits of membership.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS