Funds want fees prohibition on FHSAs


Fiona Reynolds
The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has called on the Federal Government to ensure that its new First Home Saver Account entails a 20 per cent flat Government contribution instead of the proposed income-linked Government contribution rebate scheme.
AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds said there was a need to ensure the scheme was structured in a way that made it first rate for first home buyers at the same time as assisting those hardest hit by the housing affordability crisis.
The AIST has argued in a submission to the Government that the proposed income-linked Government contribution rebate scheme would be regressive because it would award the greatest monetary benefit to those on higher incomes and higher marginal tax rates.
The AIST with the Industry Super Network and Industry Funds Forum have filed a submission with the Government on the new scheme, with industry super spokesman David Whiteley claiming that the structure of the account would be central to take-up by consumers.
“Straightforward disclosure of fees will be critical and consumer testing, to ensure first home buyers understand any fees charges, should be a priority,” he said.
The submission argues that there needs to be a uniform approach to disclosure and advice including prohibiting entry and exit fees as well as sales commission and advice fees.
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a Perth financial services firm following payments to its clients by the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort after a failed managed investment scheme.
Bravura chief executive Andrew Russell has announced he will be stepping down from the company, just under two years after his appointment.
Financial advice businesses with a younger, wealthier client base are enjoying higher valuations and increased attention from potential buyers than those with older clients.
A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rules.