Full disclosure may apply to ‘shelf fees’

compliance/SOA/disclosure/PDS/money-management/fund-managers/dealer-groups/

10 November 2006
| By Liam Egan |
image
image
expand image

Jennifer O’Donnell

The Australian Securities andInvestments Commission (ASIC) is considering making it mandatory for so-called ‘shelf fee’ arrangements between fund managers and dealer groups to be disclosed within a Statement of Advice (SOA).

Head of Compliance Jennifer O’ Donnell told Money Management that the regulator is concerned that shelf fee arrangements are “often disclosed in the financial services guides (FSG) and in product disclosure statements (PDS) but not always in SOAs”.

The concern is whether shelf fees have the “potential to ultimately influence advice to clients, because this can influence the type of products that are on offer, and if so, whether disclosure about these arrangements fees needs to flow through to the SOA”.

ASIC is currently talking to a number of industry players about their shelf fee arrangements to try to “understand for ourselves just where any stress points are located” in terms of any potential conflicts of interest, O’Donnell said.

These ongoing discussions have left her with “the impression that some of these shelf fee arrangements are pretty unobjectionable, and are being managed properly, while others are probably stretching some limits a bit more”.

There are “some questions that needed to be asked about whether shelf fees are capable of influencing advice”, she said, “but whether or not we need to come out with any guidance on this issue depends a bit on how the discussions with the industry unfold”.

“From our point of view, there’s no doubt shelf fees can be a conflict of interest if they do result in inappropriate products or in some products being favoured over others, and thus they need to be properly disclosed,” she said.

“What we as the regulator ultimately care about is transparency and consistency around the way some of these arrangements are described and then disclosed to investors.”

O’Donnell said the increased regulatory attention to shelf fees had not been initiated by the extensive commercial debate engendered by Asgard Wealth Solution’s recent decision to implement its ‘preferred partners program’.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS